Il2 Battle Of Stalingrad Forum
It's a WW2 flight combat simulator being made by a Russian company (1C) in conjunction with a US distributor (777 Studios). They call it a 'sim' but it's not a sim, it's a game. One in which they have bent certain parameters so as to hugely favour the Russian aircraft and nerf the German ones.In order to hide their chicanery they have been hiding negative posts in an access-only forum (only purchasers of the alpha version can get in there, at £50/$100 a pop), deleting threads and posts and harassing, bullying and threatening posters via PM, along with 30-day bans.Then they put the game on Steam.
And have now continued their behaviour there; locking posts and banning Steam Account holders from that forum despite them breaking no rules.Source:http://www.bikechatforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=293991. You seem so bitter, almost like a loser Nazi. The difference between a great flight sim vs flight game is strictly in the optional settings; you can set it as an arcade game, or as a highly detailed sim and various combos in between to suit yourself.If you have experienced Rise of Flight, you would appreciate the excellent quality produced by 777 Studios. Since even heavily modded IL-2 1946 is old and basically obsolete now, this new IL-2 BoS is worth trying and supporting.
I'm sure they will be improving and tweaking it if necessary, but we need a new, modern WWII flight sim/game. Meanwhile, I strongly suggest you try RoF if you want a really great WWI flight sim/game.http://riseofflight.com/en/about/features.
I am about two clicks away from purchasing it, but I want to get some opinions from everybody who owns Tank Crew before I do. I love tank sims and do have rather high expectations from any that come out. I'm not expecting Tank Crew to reach the level of Steel Beasts though, but at the very least a superior War Thunder (Which it seems to already do in some respects). Download the best games on Windows & Mac. A vast selection of titles, DRM-free, with free goodies, customer love, and one fair price for all regions. Forum Topics Posts Last post; IL2 Sturmovik: Battle of Stalingrad A place to discuss the new title from 777 and 1C Moderator: SYN Exec 112 Topics 2008 Posts Last post by SYNHaashashin Wed Jun 12, 2019 6:29 pm.
Short and stubby fuselage and wings typified the 1930s design of Russian aircraft designer Nikolai Polikarpov. Both the I-16 and I-15 designs were extremely successful and considered world beating designs of that inter-war period. By 1941, the I-16 was obsolete, bested by a generation of new fighters on both sides yet, the I-16 remained popular and available in numbers. Available 20mm cannon modification makes the I-16 a heavy hitter and its agility and diminutive size allow it to punch above its weight.
Strengths. Extremely agile with a high roll rate and good turn rate.
Good all around visibility except immediately over the nose. Available firepower modificationsWeaknesses. Unforgiving stall. Poor overall top speed compared to more modern typesMiG-3. Designed by Mikoyan and Gurevich whose design bureau would go on to create the iconic MiG-15, MiG-25 and MiG-29, the MiG-3 was the beginning of an era. Designed for anticipated operations at high altitudes and fast speeds, the MiG-3 was ill suited to the low altitude tactical warfare that had erupted on the Eastern Front.The later model represented by IL-2: Battle of Moscow has leading edge slats which make it easier to handle up to the stall and available gunpods (BK 12.7mm) and nose gun modifications (2xUB 12.7mm or 2xShVAK 20mm cannon) give the MiG-3 some flexibility in shooting down enemy bombers and fighters. Strengths.
Il2 Battle Of Stalingrad Forum
Fast at high altitudes. Good firepower optionsWeaknesses. Poorer performance versus contemporary fighters at low altitude. Poor visibility over the nose. Not able to sustain much battle damageIL-2 Model 1941.
A formation of IL-2 with tracer fire in the backgroundOver 36,000 IL-2 aircraft were constructed and this Model 1941 version represents an early example. In some ways this early model has added features that weren’t found on later aircraft. On 20mm cannon equipped versions the rear armored glass provides strong protection from enemy fire while also offering a clear view to the back.While the IL-2 Model 1941 is fairly agile, its still vulnerable to fighter interception and it lacks any provisions for a rear turret. What the IL-2 is best at is taking the fight to enemy ground troops including vehicles, armored cars and light and medium tanks.
Armor piercing rockets, high explosive bombs, and optional 23mm VYa cannons make the IL-2 a fearsome weapon when used on the frontlines. Strengths. Sturdy and heavily armored. Slightly more agile than later IL-2 variantsWeaknesses. Vulnerable to enemy fighter interception. No rear gunnerground troops including vehicles, armored cars and light and medium tanks.
Armor piercing rockets, high explosive bombs, and optional 23mm VYa cannons make the IL-2 a fearsome weapon when used on the frontlines. Pe-2 Series 35. One of the best ground attack weapons of World War II, the Pe-2 was used from early in the war to the very end and saw service in post war European air forces as well. Fast, tough and versatile, the Pe-2 Series 35 is the earliest version available in the sim and has less armor protection as well as weaker defensive armament than the later Series 87 (in IL-2: Battle of Stalingrad) though it has a slight speed edge over its heavier successor.These twin engined aircraft were often used as a light bomber, dive bomber, night fighter, and in reconnaissance roles.Highly successful, the Pe-2 nonetheless suffered greatly at the hands of the Luftwaffe’s expert pilots.
Strengths. Very fast top speed, even at cruise.
Capable of carrying a large bombload for its size and speed. Robust construction and capable of absorbing medium damage and flying onWeaknesses. Vulnerable to enemy fighter interception. Early version has weak defensive gunsP-40E-1 (Collector Plane).
Il2 Battle Of Stalingrad Forum 2
Easily one of the most iconic American fighters of World War II, the P-40E-1 is one of many thousands of Lend Lease aircraft that were sent to the Soviet Union by the United States to help in the war effort.The P-40E-1 is a mediocre fighter with some tricky handling. Its robust construction and heavy battery of six.50cal (or four with weight reduction) machine guns and reasonable bomb and rocket load make for a very good ground attack aircraft. It’s also good as a bomber interceptor at medium and low altitudes but its high altitude performance is lacking as is its climb.Much maligned, the P-40 is nonetheless a useful fighter but never a world beater. Strengths. Very powerful forward armament. Ability to take significant amounts of damage and keep on flying.
Good forward visibility except over the noseWeaknesses. Poor climb rate and average agility. In some flight regimes the aircraft can become unstableBf109E-7. The Bf109E-7 represents the last of the 1930s version of the Dora and Emil series of Messerschmidt’s classic fighter. Though still a capable fighter with good climb, speed and the best handling of the Bf109 series, this is a fighter that is very much on its way out.
In the battle for Moscow, the E-7 plays second fiddle to the more advanced and redesigned Bf109F-2 and F-4 versions. A competent fighter pilot can still make this into a powerful and dangerous opponent and should never be underestimated.The Emil series of Bf109 were ultimately used in a secondary role as a capable fighter-bomber with SC250 and SC50 bomb-racks and sufficient agility to avoid enemy ground fire – though a direct hit was often devastating for these aircraft.
Strengths. Best handling Bf109 of the series with a good turn rate and excellent stall behavior. Capable firepower with twin MG-FF/M 20mm cannons. Good ammo durationWeaknesses. Lightly protected and vulnerable to ground fire. Not as fast in climb or top speed as later models, slightly outclassed by the MiG-3 in some respectsBf109F-2.
A Pe-2 goes down in flames.The ‘Freidrich’ series of Bf109s represented a pinnacle of design and performance for Messerschmidt’s famous fighter series. Cleaned up aerodynamics with structural improvements and revised armament were all part of improving the basic Bf109 design and nearly all fighter squadrons in the early days after Barbarossa up to the Moscow battle were flying these earlier series Bf109F-2s.Early iterations of the F-2 were armed with the MG151/15 firing a 15mm cannon round at high velocity through the propeller hub. These were later changed to a MG151/20 slightly increasing the size of the shell and adding significant high explosive potential made this into a potent killer of both fighters and well armored attack aircraft like the IL-2.During its reign in the middle and end parts of 1941, the Bf109F-2 was the supreme fighter on the Eastern front with no equals.
Strengths. Excellent top speed and climb. Ample agility to take on all opponentsWeaknesses. MG151/15 armed versions suffer a little in hitting power (MG151/20 version available).Bf110E-2.
Willy Messerschmidt’s other fighter creation, the Bf110 was designed as a long range escort fighter to be flown by the cream of the Luftwaffe’s fighter pilot corps. It was too large and not agile enough to be suitable in that role and later versions like the E-2 model were more oriented towards ground attack duties.The Bf110E-2 is a capable attacker with its four 7.92mm machine guns and twin MG-FF/M 20mm cannon along with a variety of bombs including powerful SC500 general purpose bombs. A rear gunner provides adequate defense.Though not able to go toe to toe with fighters on its own, in a team environment the Bf110 can take on enemy fighters with just enough speed, agility and firepower. Enemy bombers should also fear this heavy fighter, though its larger size makes it more vulnerable to return fire from defensive gunners. Strengths. Potent firepower from its guns and available bomb attachments.
Good durability (especially with the armor upgrade) and reliability thanks to twin enginesWeaknesses. Vulnerable to agile enemy fighters.
Rear gunner has a slow firing machine gun with some restricted viewJu88A-4. Designed before the war as a Schnellbomber (fast bomber), the Ju88A-4 mostly lives up to the original intent. This is a multi-role twin engined medium bomber with very good defensive armament and a potent bomb-load that includes large numbers of small bombs or an overload up to the SC1800. Both level-bombing and dive-bombing are options for this aircraft with its strong airframe and dive-brakes.In the Battle of Moscow 1941 planeset the Ju88 is very fast and at level-bombing altitude it is difficult to catch. Its an aircraft that fits into multiple time periods from 1941 through 1944 and though its survivability versus increasingly more capable fighters goes down over time, its still an excellent aircraft. Strengths.
Fast and reasonably agile for a medium bomber. Well defended and well armed with a large payload. Flexible: capable of level-bombing and dive bombing as well as low level attacksWeaknesses. No fixed forward firing guns available on the A-4 modelMC.202 (Collector Plane). Mario Castoldi’s brilliant MC.202 design is often compared to the Bf109 and was often confused with the Japanese Ki-61 as well.
Though all three of these fighters share the same basic DB601 engine, the MC.202 is very much its own fighter design drawing much from its predecessor. Crisp handling and good overall performance are the highlights of this Italian fighter. Its greatest defect was its poor armament with twin Breda SAFAT 12.7mm machine guns firing at slower speeds with less hitting power than similar American, Russian or German equivalents.There was only a small amount of use by the MC.202 on the Eastern Front with a couple of squadrons participating in battles near Stalingrad and one squadron involved with escorts of Stukas into the Stalingrad area during the early stages of the battle. Strengths. Agile and forgiving handling. One of the highest dive speeds of any aircraft in-gameWeaknesses. Lightly armed even when adding additional machine guns (20mm gunpods do increase firepower).